Insurers and employers want to be able to
make HRA and FSA rollovers into HSAs -- all year long, and
determined by the free market. Instead, the provision which
passed is intended to simply eliminate HRAs and FSAs and replace
them with HSAs. The section of the bill is entitled "HRA And FSA
Terminations To Fund HSAs." Insurers and employers may actually
lobby against the bill if it gets any farther, but nobody
expects it to survive.
The report language is very clever. Its
title describes the provision in detail as if it would "Allow
rollovers from health FSAs and HRAs into HSAs for a limited
time." In the last sentence it reveals that "The proposal is
limited to one distribution with respect to each health FSA or
HRA of the individual."
The number of employers who would actually
convert HRAs to HSAs has never been measured, so the cost
estimates in the legislation are pure speculation and the bank
deposits resulting from this provision are unknown. However, the
bank deposits from allowing market-based HRA-HSA rollovers can
be easily quantified with existing market experience -- and are
likely to be much larger. Banks would be better off under the
original bill.
The proposal modifies the limit on the annual deductible
contributions that can be made to an HSA so that the maximum
deductible contribution is not limited to the annual deductible
under the high deductible health plan. Under the proposal, the
maximum aggregate annual contribution that can be made to an HSA
is $2,700 (as indexed for inflation after 2006) in the case of
self-only coverage and $5,450 (as indexed for inflation after
2006) in the case of family coverage.
Everybody supports this.
Everybody supports this no-cost change.
Everybody supports this, but it costs
money.
This would encode the cafeteria plan
exception letting employers income-adjust contributions to HSAs
as long as they are making higher contributions to lower-income
workers.
There are issues here between banks and
brokerages. We don't believe the entire brokerage community was
consulted, since the fees earned on IRAs and those on HSAs will
be very different. Possibly banks will benefit at the expense of
brokerages, but in any case this one won't pass without going
through the banking committees in both House and Senate -- next
year.